JEE Advanced Concept Reading Time: 12 min Key Formula

The "Missing Orders" Phenomenon: When Interference and Diffraction Collude

Understanding why certain interference maxima mysteriously disappear due to diffraction effects - a classic JEE Advanced puzzle.

95%

JEE Relevance

3-4

Marks per Question

Key Condition

2min

Avg. Solve Time

The Great Disappearance Act in Wave Optics

In the double-slit experiment with finite slit width, something peculiar happens: certain interference maxima go missing. This isn't an error - it's the fascinating interplay between interference and diffraction.

🎯 Why JEE Loves This Concept

This phenomenon beautifully tests your understanding of superposition principles and appears in 1-2 questions per JEE Advanced paper. Mastering it demonstrates deep conceptual clarity.

🚀 Quick Navigation

Basic Concept Mathematical Condition Visual Explanation Practice Problems

1. Understanding the Two Effects

Interference vs. Diffraction: The Dual Nature

💡 Interference Effect

Due to two slits acting as coherent sources
Determines positions of maxima and minima
Condition for maxima: $d\sin\theta = n\lambda$
Uniform intensity if slits were point sources

🌊 Diffraction Effect

Due to finite width of each slit
Determines intensity distribution
Condition for minima: $a\sin\theta = m\lambda$
Acts as an "envelope" for interference pattern

The Collusion: When Effects Overlap

The Critical Insight

In real double-slit experiments, both effects occur simultaneously. The actual intensity at any point is:

$$I(\theta) = I_0 \left(\frac{\sin\beta}{\beta}\right)^2 \cos^2\alpha$$

Where:

$\beta = \frac{\pi a \sin\theta}{\lambda}$ (Diffraction term)
$\alpha = \frac{\pi d \sin\theta}{\lambda}$ (Interference term)
$a$ = slit width, $d$ = slit separation

2. The Missing Orders Condition

Deriving the Disappearance Formula

Step-by-Step Derivation

Step 1: Interference Maxima Condition

For constructive interference between two slits:

$$d\sin\theta = n\lambda \quad \text{where } n = 0, \pm1, \pm2, \ldots$$

Step 2: Diffraction Minima Condition

For destructive interference due to single-slit diffraction:

$$a\sin\theta = m\lambda \quad \text{where } m = \pm1, \pm2, \pm3, \ldots$$

Step 3: The Collision Condition

When both conditions are satisfied simultaneously:

$$\frac{d\sin\theta}{a\sin\theta} = \frac{n\lambda}{m\lambda}$$

$$\frac{d}{a} = \frac{n}{m}$$

Step 4: The Final Condition

For interference maximum of order $n$ to be missing:

$$n = \frac{d}{a} \cdot m \quad \text{where } m = \pm1, \pm2, \pm3, \ldots$$

💡 Key Interpretation

The ratio $\frac{d}{a}$ determines which interference orders disappear. If $\frac{d}{a} = 3$, then every 3rd interference maximum (n = 3, 6, 9...) will be missing due to diffraction minima.

3. Visualizing the Phenomenon

Intensity Distribution Pattern

Intensity Pattern for d/a = 3

-3

-2

-1

Observation: The 3rd, 6th, 9th... interference maxima are missing because they coincide with diffraction minima.

Physical Interpretation

Why Do Orders Disappear?

Think of it this way:

Interference says: "At this angle, waves from two slits should constructively interfere"
Diffraction says: "But at this same angle, each slit itself produces zero intensity"
Result: Zero times anything is still zero! The maximum disappears.

Analogy: It's like having two singers (slits) who would normally harmonize perfectly (interference maxima), but if both singers lose their voices (diffraction minima) at that particular note, no sound is produced!

4. Worked Examples

Example 1: Basic Missing Order Calculation

Problem Statement

In a double-slit experiment, slit separation is 0.2 mm and slit width is 0.05 mm. Which interference maxima will be missing?

Step 1: Calculate the ratio

$$\frac{d}{a} = \frac{0.2}{0.05} = 4$$

Step 2: Apply missing orders condition

Missing orders occur when: $n = 4m$ where $m = \pm1, \pm2, \pm3, \ldots$

Step 3: List missing orders

Missing orders: $n = \pm4, \pm8, \pm12, \ldots$

Example 2: JEE Advanced Level

Problem Statement

In Young's double-slit experiment, the 5th interference maximum is observed to be missing. If the slit separation is 1.5 mm, find the slit width.

Step 1: Understand the given information

5th maximum is missing ⇒ n = 5 is a missing order

Step 2: Apply missing orders formula

$$n = \frac{d}{a} \cdot m \Rightarrow 5 = \frac{d}{a} \cdot m$$

The smallest possible m is 1 (since m = ±1, ±2, ...)

Step 3: Solve for slit width

$$5 = \frac{1.5}{a} \cdot 1 \Rightarrow a = \frac{1.5}{5} = 0.3 \text{ mm}$$

5. Practice Problems

Test Your Understanding

Problem 1: In a double-slit experiment, d = 0.3 mm and a = 0.1 mm. Which interference maxima will be missing?

Hint: Calculate d/a ratio first

Problem 2: If the 3rd and 6th interference maxima are missing, what is the ratio d/a?

Hint: Missing orders occur at n = (d/a)×m

Problem 3: In an experiment, slit width is halved while keeping separation constant. How does this affect missing orders?

Hint: Consider what happens to d/a ratio

Problem 4: Can the central maximum (n=0) ever be missing? Explain why or why not.

Hint: Think about diffraction pattern at θ=0

📋 Quick Reference Guide

Key Formulas

Missing orders: $n = \frac{d}{a} \cdot m$
Interference maxima: $d\sin\theta = n\lambda$
Diffraction minima: $a\sin\theta = m\lambda$
Intensity: $I = I_0\left(\frac{\sin\beta}{\beta}\right)^2\cos^2\alpha$

Key Points

Missing orders occur when interference maxima coincide with diffraction minima
The ratio d/a determines which orders disappear
Central maximum (n=0) is never missing
As slit width decreases, more orders disappear

⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid

❌

Confusing m and n

m is for diffraction minima, n is for interference maxima

❌

Forgetting absolute values

Missing orders occur on both sides of central maximum

❌

Mixing up conditions

Interference maxima: d sinθ = nλ; Diffraction minima: a sinθ = mλ

Mastered Missing Orders?

This concept demonstrates the beautiful complexity of wave optics and your ability to handle multi-layered physical phenomena

More Wave Optics